A read-only archive of the Product Notes community, 2018–2024. When you buy through links on this site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Tiny Books Fit in One Hand. Will They Change the Way We Read?

Thought this was interesting. Tiny books that are read and work kind of like a flip book.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/29/business/mini-books-pocket-john-green.html

The only books I’ve seen like this are pocket bibles or pocket constitutions. I love the thought of easily storing a book in my pocket to read on the train, taking an Uber or just sitting in the nearby park.

It appears this has been tried before though—supposedly called a flipbook. I found this comment in a thread elsehwere.

They launched this format, calling it “Flipbooks”, in the UK in 2011: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/mar/20/could-this-kil…

It wasn’t a success. In all, it looks like they only released a handful in the initial 2011 launch period, then didn’t release any more.1

I had a copy of Cloud Atlas in flipback format, and it was… okay. I bought it in that format purely for the novelty of it. It felt a bit like reading off a pair of playing cards hinged together, but wasn’t entirely unpleasant. Reading a fullsize paperback is nicer if you like the paper reading experience. The paper alone makes a difference; it’s very thin and crinkly, like old onion skin paper, or the paper in a Bible, or the paper you buy to roll your own cigarettes.

The main advantage it has over a Kindle or Kobo is that the book itself folds down smaller – a little bigger than an iPod Classic or a pack of cigarettes – and it won’t run out of battery power. In most other respects, the eReader has the advantage.

I don’t know anyone else who’s ever read one.

Has anyone else read one of these tiny books?

1 reply

loklav

Flipping through a book in the manner pictured seems incredibly awkward. Does anyone actually want to read that way?

Why not just print slightly smaller like all the other pocket bibles?