loklav
(Internet Guy)
May 7, 2019, 9:40pm
1
Looks like Google is trying to move down-market with the new Pixel 3a. The base model costs $399 and the 3a XL is $479. This is a great move for a lot of people priced out of the Pixel 3.
From the look of it the specs aren’t that different:
Same 4GB LPDDR4 RAM, but no 128GB persistent storage option
Slower processor than the Pixel 3:
Pixel 3a: Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 2.0GHz + 1.7GHz, 64Bit Octa-Core
Pixel 3a XL: Qualcomm Snapdragon™ 845 2.5GHz + 1.6GHz
No wireless charging. Probably not a big deal unless you have a Pixel Stand
It appears to lack Advanced x-axis haptics for sharper/defined response
3a only has one front facing camera instead of dual front cameras
3a has a headphone jack—this has to be a plus for a ton of people!
EDIT: Formatting improvements
Sam
(Sam Solomon)
May 8, 2019, 10:42am
2
Well, that’s infuriating. Especially, after trying to a replacement set of USB-C headphones.
I recently went to go visit a friend in Kentucky and left my Pixel USB-C Headphones there. My friend keeps telling me that he’ll ship them, but I’m skeptical. He’s busy and just forgets.
What’s the status of cheap USB-C headphones these days? I would love something Like the Panasonic EgroFit for USB-C.
Is there something worth considering or should I just purchase another $30 pair of Google’s USB-C headphones?
Sam
(Sam Solomon)
May 8, 2019, 11:06am
3
Also, added a link to your post. I figured the Google blog post by the same name was relevant for your commentary.
loklav
(Internet Guy)
May 14, 2019, 8:47pm
4
Ah, thought I added that. Thanks!